Lei Feng said that treating the enemy should be as cold as winter. At that time, China regarded all capitalist countries as enemies, even the Soviet Union as enemies, but the facts proved that this was wrong. It took us so long to get along with the world and develop together. Now we all feel ridiculous when we see that North Korea is poor and still builds bombs to deal with the enemy. I think Comrade Lei Feng may have been right, but it is foolish to think about it from the present perspective.
Again, I think it is necessary to restate my point of view. Whenever we do something for a purpose, we must consider people and treat friends, relatives and enemies equally. Whether we are an ordinary individual or a leader, we must protect everyone, including the enemy, as much as possible. We may sacrifice some individuals or hurt some enemy individuals, but when we do this, we should and must be leaders. Appropriate supervision machines are necessary.
Brother Yidao may say that I am naive and idealistic, but I say that this is as necessary as remembering to maintain the spirit and culture when vigorously developing the economy. I think that although they are tired of calling everyone every day, they can’t contribute to the development of the society in some ways, but they represent a conscience. They are always around us and wake up. Maybe you will think that this is not, but without them, the development of the society will definitely be off track.
Many people will say that abortion is good for parents and children, but I still say that it is unfair to the baby. This is actually to make the baby’s young parents irresponsible for paying the price. The baby has already paid for abortion, but I don’t want to put it another way. I think abortion does a lot of things as if it is necessary and actually depriving others of benefits. Of course, we can say that this is necessary, but we must do it with a guilty attitude at the same time.
I say this because I think that although Brother Heaven admits that people must be considered, he doesn’t feel sorry when he talks about sacrificing individuals in most discussions, but naturally thinks that these sacrifices should be made. This is the place where I disagree most, because you said that this time is a person who sacrifices others, not a victim, not an objective observer who is detached from things.
Profit belongs to the person who has the ability. A baby is like a blank sheet of paper. Does it have the ability to choose? When you say that the ability to choose refers to whether the baby knows how to choose life, then letting the baby know will make his blood hurt. He will try to avoid the knife as much as possible. It can be seen that the baby knows how to choose life. When you say that the ability to choose refers to whether he can overcome the desire to kill others, it is just like saying that he is weak.
Besides, if you don’t have the ability to kill the benefits, wouldn’t it be the case that the disadvantaged groups should be slaughtered? Because you don’t have the ability, you can’t support them. I said that strength is to be a man because of the ability. I agree with Brother Gao that it is the law of the jungle that determines the benefits because of the ability.
Carry a pot and rush
In fact, human beings are not the law of the jungle, but human beings will listen to names to cover it up. Isn’t the world a more humiliating creature than human beings?
A thousand red cries and Wan Yan grieves.
After dinner, a cup of black tea, Master Kong, iced black tea, Xianqi advertised, that kind of reclining and sitting because of drinking too much. I met a few brothers in every way. Of course, I got drunk. Let’s continue to argue with Brother Hu. I hope Brother Hu doesn’t mind my argument. First of all, I thank Brother Hu for giving me comfort. In fact, I really don’t feel sorry. Is my sense of humor so bad that Brother Hu really laughed at my jokes? But I still appreciate Brother Hu’s sincere words of thanks to my heart. Hehehe, I’m not that fragile. It’s just a joke, Brother Hu. I saw Brother Yi Dao say that it’s not less than sacrificing an individual. I didn’t care about the feelings of the sacrificed individual at all. Finally, I added the most annoying thing. I jumped up as if I had been stabbed in the ass by a needle. I chattered a lot. Those words weren’t directed at Brother Yi Dao. I expressed my views face to face. Brother Hu, you don’t have to apologize. It’s better to argue fiercely than sacrificing an individual. I am subjective, that is, I am a sacrificed individual. I must regret that I said I want to be a Cheng Ying
I’m not a public security law, and I didn’t admit to punishing the murderer because I was afraid that he would kill me. In fact, I want to say that punishing the prisoner is to safeguard the dignity of the law, in fact, it is to safeguard the best interests of the legal class. At this stage, we are members of the ruling class, and the greatest function of the law is to embody the will and interests of the ruling class. In fact, manslaughter actually violates the will and interests of the ruling class, because this kind of behavior brings hidden dangers to the stability of the ruling class, thus affecting the stability of the ruling class.
In the case of manslaughter, it is by no means necessary to decide according to the seriousness of the circumstances. In this regard, several of my colleagues have told me some cases.
However, the protection of the law, the army, the police and so on is not necessarily the interests of the majority, but the interests of the ruling class. I won’t talk much about this after the political class. I said that the punishment for manslaughter is absolutely necessary, and this punishment is not as simple as maximizing the interests. It has already reached a meeting. In fact, it is not a social interest. Isn’t it the greatest interest?
Brother Hu, you didn’t take a good look at the foil record. It says that it may be said that doing so will be cruel and will be spurned by future generations. But I can’t remember what they said that I would like to be wild in the sunshine. I have always admired this sentence extremely, and even if I am the enemy of the people in the end, I won’t change my original intention. Brother RICEWHU is almost a very subjective question. Let’s discuss it again without bringing the war in the self-protection evaluation area here. Let’s forget it.
Qian Hong cries. Brother Wan Yan’s sympathy thinks that my approach to the meeting is a natural selection meeting. Maybe human beings are not the meanest, and the law of the jungle is indeed the iron rule. Otherwise, how can we wait for tea and chat while people have to work hard outside?
Perhaps human beings are not the meanest, and the law of the jungle is indeed the iron law. The most qualitative difference between human beings and animals lies in whether they can be smart and not driven by simple interests. Everything is the law of the jungle, so many novels praise the chivalrous spirit except the strong and help the weak, and it is nothing.
Brother Hu is always easier to find enemies than we are. Can we build a root to push potential enemies to promote national progress after destroying real enemies? Besides, people and places are contradictory, and classes are afraid of no enemies.
Besides helping the weak, why do you hoe the strong? Because you are stronger, you can count the strong and weak meat, and the weak meat may be because it is grass and the carnivore disdains to eat it.
A knife in heaven
It is true that human beings have continued in this way, but it does not mean that human beings should continue in this form forever. Human beings will continue to develop to this day, and because human beings are organized and intelligent, they let us know that if we want to be born with unity and mutual assistance in a harsh environment, human beings will continue to evolve and strive to maximize the benefits.
Is it too high?
Brother Gao, I leave my humanity to my own people and other countries to go aside. It is a very subjective issue for self-protection, and then we will discuss whether to bring the war in the self-protection evaluation area here or not.
A knife in heaven
Not afraid of chivalrous men is the theme of praise. I suggest you take it too seriously. The protagonist in it is the most standard chivalrous man in my opinion. He knows that he wants to challenge is a huge man. He is very afraid, but his natural chivalrous spirit drives him to fear and fight hard. Didn’t you say no, you have to raise your hand, then you have to talk about something, or you have to say it because of difficulties. Although thousands of people have gone their own way.
Carry a pot and rush
Brother Gao’s China culture is the most particular about Baldor complaining about what interests are, but if you want to average others, you have to be willing to do it. The history of humiliation in the past 100 years can’t wake you up. Okay, you tell Xiao Ri that you are separated only by a strip of water. He told you to live in peace, but he didn’t even admit that you gave him the resources to invade China. He left you a gas bomb. This is unity, mutual assistance, and you want to maximize the benefits.
A knife in heaven
Where political science is really out of date, but the class judgment part is definitely not out of date, I very much doubt that the biggest function of law is actually to reflect the will and interests of the ruling class. In fact, manslaughter is a violation of the will and interests of the ruling class. Because this kind of behavior brings hidden dangers to the stability of the ruling class, it is said that punishing him is to safeguard the best interests of the majority, that is, the ruling class. Of course, this sentence refers to our socialist society. I said that there is not much difference, but I explained it from another angle
Carry a pot and rush
I haven’t read everyone’s words about self-protection, but after reading everyone’s words, Ji knows that I will never be such a protagonist. This writing method is especially cruel while saying that even if you will treat me like a bad person in the future, I still have to do it after you are safe. I really feel sick when I do the worst thing in the world and put on a great sage. Is it possible for everyone to kill with a knife, so it is not allowed to produce knives, so I will kill everyone?
Nalan
I think they are tired of calling everyone every day. In some ways, they can’t contribute to the development of the society, but they represent a kind of conscience. This will make it necessary to treat some people differently. The real purpose of the human society is still to be divided into different interest groups, and the uneven distribution of resources will inevitably lead to the struggle of various groups. For those who really care about people, it is absolutely conscience, and it is an indispensable reason for avoiding the society and developing into a cold society.
Is it too high?
Brother Gao, you can say that it’s a minority. It’s a mad dog. I can’t bite it back because the dog bit me, but I want to tell you that China, the teacher of the past, is too lenient to be bullied by others. If we go on like this, the Chinese nation will stand in the national forest of the world.
A knife in heaven
This assumption of committing a crime is the most hateful thing. First, assume that you will commit a crime, then look for evidence, and then decide to kill you. Even the evidence is not needed, and even the pretence is not done, because civilians may become soldiers to kill people. I will kill such people. Let’s forget it, and it may lead to disputes in other people’s evaluation areas here
A mad dog bit me, but I won’t bite back, but I will beat the dog with a stick, but I won’t kill all the dogs because of a mad dog.
There have been many massacres in war stories since ancient times. In ancient Rome, wars have either killed all others or captured slave China. The massacre has never stopped. Even Junren claimed that Li Shimin was called Tiankhan by all ethnic groups beyond the Great Wall. Compared with February River, Kangxi Zhou Peigong led the troops to do the battle. He once slaughtered the city, robbed and burned it casually to stimulate the sergeant. However, it is difficult for people to resent him in combination with the cause and effect, and if the situation slows down, he will pay attention to the restraint department’s refusal to do the massacre again.
Nalan
Is China really doing something like killing Japan like some of the posts? Can the Chinese nation still be in this world? Isn’t the earth China Day, a country that dares to kill all countries? Will other countries feel at ease in such a crazy country? Won’t they be afraid that this crazy country will go crazy that day and destroy that one, and that one will also wipe out its humanity when doing something that is said to be due to the enemy?
Is it too high?
There is also another kind of massacre of civilians, that is, guerrilla warfare prevails, and soldiers and civilians are mixed together. The easiest way to deal with this kind of battle is not to divide the troops and slaughter all the people. At the beginning, the Japanese burned and robbed everything like this. I know that war is cruel, and I don’t expect others to preach benevolence and morality everywhere in the war, but things that are too dark are unwilling to accept the indiscriminate killing. I don’t have much to satisfy the tyrannical cruelty.
Nalan